An ancient poet, not Euripides, wrote:
Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.
If we replace “gods” with the three persons of the Trinity, is this what is happening to the Church of England?
Certainly the church seems to have gone mad. Having decided in principle that it wants women as bishops, it has spent years going round in circles trying to find an acceptable formula for this, only to reject its chosen formula today, by a narrow margin. That is not the action of a sane and rational body. And it is a sad farewell for outgoing Archbishop Rowan Williams.
I’m not quite saying that today’s vote was irrational, because it may be that the proposed compromise with opponents was so insane that it was rational to reject it. Surely one can doubt the sanity of anyone who tries to push through a compromise which is completely rejected by one of the parties involved. But would that party have accepted any compromise?
It seems to me that the only way ahead now is the one suggested by Sam Norton in his post Please can we now do women bishops the right way? There is no future in trying to compromise between black and white. As the Apostle Paul asked, “what fellowship can light have with darkness?” (2 Corinthians 6:14, NIV) Of course, each side will say that they are light and their opponents are darkness, but that just proves the point. So, just as on the first day of creation God “separated the light from the darkness” (Genesis 1:4), at this point there needs to be not a compromise but a separation. We just need to make sure that the kinds of procedures Sam outlines are followed. Then, unlike what has happened in The Episcopal Church in the USA, the separation can hopefully be an amicable one which does not lead to lawsuits and mutual anathemas.
Of course if the Trinity really wishes to destroy the Church of England, no human scheme will be able to preserve it. But it may not be too late for that body to repent, put its house in order, and find itself again under God’s blessing. Archbishop-elect Justin Welby looks like a good choice of leader for this difficult task. Today’s vote will have made the task harder, but the long term result just may be a cleaner and so stronger Church of England.
I see some of my readers today have found my 2007 post Bishops without borders, including women. Rereading my own post reminds me that Sam’s proposal is in effect the same as many opponents of women bishops were calling for in 2007: a separate province. Maybe if the proposal is presented as such it will find supporters on both sides of the argument.
So what has Ezra got to do with women Bishops?
Agree with you Peter that separate provinces are probably needed.
Iconoclast, I spammed the comment about Ezra, as completely off topic.
All of Western Protestantism is faced with its impending secularization. They are however a state church, which aside from majority convictions, is a political arena that must follow governmental legislation. Still pop-culture should be excluded.
Thank you, Wesley. Yes, secularization is a major challenge for churches, to which they have responded in various ways. And being a state church complicates things for the C of E. But Paul commended adapting to the culture, being “all things to all men”. So why exclude adapting to pop culture?
Because popular culture is a trap, of course.
Jesus prayed “My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one.” (John 17:15, NIV) But you, Wesley, seem to be trying to frustrate Jesus’ prayer by recommending Christians to withdraw from the world and its culture, rather than living within it under the Father’s protection from the evil one.
You are an Emergent. I reject you in Christ’s name.
Wesley, do you reject me, or do you reject the words of Jesus which I quoted to you, and the ones of Paul which I alluded to in an earlier comment? I will overlook you rejecting me, but will Jesus overlook you rejecting his word?
The postmodern seek to play a game of naivety; as if Christ was a fool. What you do not want to come to terms with is yourselves; in that the West popularly and consciously reject Christ and The Church. Are you in The World? I will not reply any further.
P.S.
Or of The World?