Internet Explorer users lack Gentle Wisdom

I’m not sure whether to apologise to people trying to read Gentle Wisdom with Internet Explorer 7. I realise that some of you have no choice. But according to the buzz (thanks to David Keen for the tip)and my own research this popular browser has a bug which is causing it to crash in response to some Javascript code generated by SiteMeter. So the problem is not my fault, it is up to you who are using poor quality software.

As a temporary measure I will disable SiteMeter. In fact I need it only to support TTLB, and, as I warned last week, I have had enough of TTLB. So I will shortly remove both SiteMeter and TTLB from this blog, which will hopefully make it accessible with Interner Explorer. However, Commentful has suddenly started working today, so I will monitor it for a bit longer.

As a long term fix, I offer my readers this piece of gentle wisdom: switch to Firefox.

Last chance for Blogflux Commentful, and for TTLB

I find Blogflux Commentful to be a useful tool for keeping track of comments on posts which I am interested in. That is, I do when it is working properly. But, sadly, that is quite often not the case. I wrote here in January of serious problems which I was having with Commentful, and of the company’s failure to respond to support tickets. Indeed at that time I couldn’t even submit support tickets to them. I came very close to abandoning Commentful for another tool like co.mments (despite the unhelpful requirement at its main site to register even to find out what it is, circumvented by going straight to its wiki). But Jacob, one of the Commentful team, noticed my post and, despite not giving a working e-mail address, quickly sorted out my immediate main problem. So I decided to persist.

But Commentful has continued not to work well. It has never been properly able to track Blogger blogs. On my watclist page it is suppose to list WordPress blogs something like “MetaCatholic » Kirk and Bentley, dog and bone” or “An Open Letter to An Open Theist « New Leaven“, but instead of “»” or “«” I see the symbol “�”, which is a “replacement character” for an invalid character code. (Tip to Commentful staff: you need to copy this text from WordPress as Unicode and not read blog names with a specific code page.) And I would judge that over the last few months at least 10% of the time, often for several hours on end, the service has been down, meaning that I am unable to add new posts to my watchlist or read the watchlist.

More serious problems started about two weeks ago, when Commentful suddenly stopped checking my watchlist for updates. This is something which it is supposed to do every 15 minutes, but it has not done so for at least 15 days. Probably at the same time it stopped updating my personal RSS feed, and I can date this by the time of the last update on that feed according to Bloglines: “Thu, Jul 10 2008 3:47 AM”. I can still add new posts to my watchlist. But the only way I can tell which of them have new comments on them is by opening each of them from the link in the watchlist, which gets very time-consuming.

I reported this latest problem to Blogflux over a week ago, using their online support form, but have had no response and the problem has not been fixed.

Since last time the only way I could get any response from Blogflux was to blog about how full of bugs their product is, I will do this again, in the hope that in this way I can get a response from them. But if this doesn’t get fixed very soon now I will shift to a different product.

Another blogging product which I am getting fed up with is TTLB. I have had their “ecosystem” in my sidebar on and off for some time with the caveat “(but expecting to evolve to something larger when full statistics are picked up for this blog)”. But I have failed to evolve beyond “Crawly Amphibian”, and have recently slipped back to “Flippery Fish”, largely because of a persistent failure of TTLB to pick up more than a handful of the incoming links to my blog. This should be a nice humorous tool, but it is useless if it doesn’t work properly. If my incoming links are not listed soon I will drop it from my sidebar.

God the Blogger

While commenting on TC Robinson’s Open Letter to an Open Theist, I realised that I had found an interesting analogy which might help to explain some of the complex issues of free will and predestination. Or maybe the whole thing is just far too simplistic.

It is an old analogy to compare the relationship between God and the created world with that between an author and the fictional world of his or her novel. On this analogy God is in full control of the whole storyline, of everything which happens. The characters in the novel may have free will within that fictional world, but in the real world they have no freedom, indeed no independent existence. As I understand it this kind of model corresponds quite well with Calvinism. It is consistent with the compatibilism which Jeremy Pierce finds in Calvinism in that the characters have real free will within their own world. It is hard to argue against such a model. Yet somehow it is not a compelling one because it reduces the dignity of humanity to a set of pawns in the mind of God.

I would like to put forward a rather different model in which God is a blogger! He can post what he likes on his blog, including stories of a world he has created and the people who inhabit it. But my model differs from the one of God as novelist in that human beings, spiritual beings like God, are not just characters described on the blog but also in the same world as God, perhaps “seated in the heavenly places”, and with real free will not controlled by God. As such they are able to read the blog, and, crucially, also have some input into it.

God as a blogger could of course make his blog entirely read-only, as for example Adrian Warnock has done. By doing so he would on my understanding make it not a blog at all. In my model this would correspond with a Calvinist position in which God decides everything, at least in the real world, with human freedom restricted to the world inside the non-blog. This is equivalent to the model of God as novelist. It is perhaps not accidental that non-blogs like this are popular among Calvinists.

But on my preferred version of the model God has chosen, voluntarily, to open up the blog so that others, humans, can interact with him on it. On a real blog that interaction is typically limited to commenting. But on my model the humans can also write the main text, within limits set by God which might include that they can only write or edit posts about themselves. Indeed God might let the humans do most of the posting at least about matters which concern them, getting involved himself only when the humans ask him to or to put things right when they go seriously wrong. Thus what happens in the stories on the blog depends largely on the genuinely free decisions of the humans in God’s world, and not just on what God determines. Actually perhaps a wiki is a better analogy here than a blog.

Nevertheless, God retains complete control of the blog. He can moderate and reverse any edits. He can withdraw access privileges from those who abuse them. He can also write people in and out of the story as and when he wishes. In the blog world he is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent.

Crucially for the open theism debate, if he decides to do something on the blog, nothing can stop him doing it. This does not mean that he controls everything that happens on the blog. But it does mean that if he announces a plan to do something at a certain time and in a certain way we can be sure that he actually can and will do it, even if in order to do so he has to undo some things which others have done.

I’m not sure how good a model this is of the interaction between God, his creation and humanity. It is certainly not a perfect one. But it may be closer to the truth than the model of God as novelist. And it may address some of the issues which have led to Open Theism, the idea that God doesn’t exhaustively know the future, without following that path to its false conclusion of that God is not omnipotent.

Dave Walker capitulates on ex-SPCK bookshops

Dave Walker, cartoonist and blogger extraordinaire, blogger for the Church Times, friend of bishops (he’s the one on the right) and hanger-on (when they let him in) at the Lambeth conference, has shown what he is made of – that it is the typical spineless stuff of British Anglicans, who typically give in to every demand from Americans. (Well, the same is true of British politicians.) For in his fight to save the former SPCK bookshops, sold off for a song to the American Eastern Orthodox group St Stephen the Great Charitable Trust (SSGCT, or just SSG), Dave has capitulated at the first shot from his American opponents.

Dave writes today:

This morning I was sent a ‘cease and desist’ demand from Mark Brewer relating to the posts I have made about the former SPCK bookshops. The demand says ‘Confidential – not to be redistributed or posted’, so I am not posting the text.

The demand says that if I do not remove all SSG-related material by noon today, July 22, 2008, an injunction will be sought against me and legal action taken for damages for libel.

I have therefore removed all of the SPCK/SSG posts on this blog, as, although I believe I have not done anything wrong I do not have the money to face a legal battle. The removal of these posts is in no way an admission of guilt.

To say I am not happy about the decision I have been forced to take here is an understatement. I feel as if I have let many people down who have relied on this site over the last year or more.

Mark Brewer is an American lawyer and chairman of SSGCT.

But, Dave, you have not been forced to make this decision. Mark Brewer is making an empty threat. I am not a lawyer, but it is quite clear even to me that the material you posted about the bookshops is at least for the most part perfectly legal. There can be no question of libel concerning the matters of fact in the public domain which make up the great majority of what you have written, and of the comments which you have allowed. You have routinely removed comments which might be considered defamatory. There may be minor specific matters which could be judged defamatory and so which you should remove. But in demanding a general removal of all material Mark Brewer does not have a leg to stand on. This is a basic issue of your freedom of expression, which is protected under national and international law. As bloggers we need to stand up against threats of this kind.

British courts do not take kindly to clever American lawyers trying to take out injunctions against ordinary people to stop them doing what they have a perfect right to do. If Brewer actually brings this to court, which is unlikely, he will be sent packing.

My advice, as a non-lawyer, to you would be to reinstate the posts and write back to Mark Brewer. You should say that you will not remove all the material because at least the majority of it is factual and therefore not defamatory, and you have a legal right to post it as a matter of freedom of expression. I suggest you also offer to remove any specific sections of posts or comments which they can demonstrate to you as being defamatory. The very least that will do is gain you some time as they will be forced to read all of your material to select some of it. If they send back a short list of items they would like removed, then comply or at least edit out what is truly defamatory. If they insist again on a blanket removal, offer to see them in court.

If you need legal advice but can’t afford to pay for it, I am sure there are people around who will offer this as part of their work to protect human rights in this country. Newspapers of course have legal teams to protect the rights of expression of their correspondents. I’m sure that even the Church Times has, and they may help you, but then they are British Anglicans.

Phil Groom’s blog about the former SPCK bookshops is still accessible, at least as I write. I wonder how long it will last. Probably at least until Phil returns from his holiday, as if he has been sent a similar letter to Dave’s he will not receive it until he returns. But I hope Phil is made of sterner stuff than Dave and does not capitulate to empty threats from the Brewers.

Congratulations to John and Alison Richardson

Congratulations to John Richardson, the Ugley Vicar, and his bride Alison, who were married this morning. John kept this news very close to his chest. And even on the very morning of his wedding he was still blogging, not just to make the first public announcement of his wedding (meanwhile bizarrely if not accidentally disabling the posting of congratulatory comments), but also to comment on other posts, including this comment and this one in which he writes, concerning ordination of women:

my wife-to-be disagrees with me on this and we’ve managed to stay together a long while without either of us conceding much! …

I think her (Alison’s) arguments are pretty (well, actually totally) unconvincing, but she makes me think, which can’t be bad.

I am glad Alison is making John think, and presumably vice versa. John certainly makes me think, even though I often disagree with him  But it will be interesting to see how long he can actually share the (notional) Ugley Vicarage with Alison before he gradually finds her arguments beginning to convince him.

I wish them a long and happy marriage as they come closer to one another and to Jesus in heart and also in mind!

Jim West's secret life revealed

A few days ago I read in a comment, I forget where but I think it might have been from David Ker, that my fellow blogger Dr Jim West is unusually secretive about his private life. Well, by a happy accident in the last few days I received an e-mail, in fact three copies of the same one, which reveal his secret life:

Contact Dr. James West for the claim of £1,350,000.00 GBP which you have won in IRISH NATIONAL LOTTERY.Provide your Names,Address,Age,Occupation,Tel,Country. Email: …

Yes, this must be our very own Dr West letting the cat out of the bag about his day job: running a lottery in Ireland! I don’t remember buying a ticket for it, but maybe the ever generous Jim bought tickets for me and presumably for his other favourite bloggers.

Jim, I am waiting for my cheque.

David Ker, his comments and his Mum

David Ker has posted about his Mum (as she is British I use the British spelling!) who is seriously ill at the moment.

Because of this I have taken the unusual step of withdrawing, at least temporarily, my post “A blind man leads the blind”, which was critical of David for closing comments on his blog (understandable in the circumstances) and for what he wrote in a post which he has withdrawn.

Please join me in praying for David’s Mum and the whole family.

Deadly sins and blog boredom

I admit to committing, at various times on this blog, almost all of Lingamish’s seven deadly blog sins. But I don’t think I have ever posted a cute photo. Somehow I don’t do cute. When I am tempted to admire pictures of babies and kittens, I think of what the baby would be like to look after and what the kitten will grow into.

Today I could commit another deadly sin by boasting to you that my blog has just passed the 100,000 visitors milestone. Well, of course I am guilty by writing this even in a hypothetical sentence. As this figure is from WordPress blog stats it probably means counting only since last August. In fact visits have been averaging around 1,000 per day (more during the week, less at weekends) for the last three weeks, because of the revival that Todd Bentley, or discussion of him, has brought to Gentle Wisdom. Several hundred people each day have been finding this blog from searches for “Todd Bentley” and similar. I am glad that they are finding what I hope is some sense about him, and not just the ranting condemnations which are so widespread.

But somehow I have lost the heart to boast or even to post about anything significant. Am I getting bored with blogging? Perhaps. Am I getting bored with discussing and defending Todd Bentley? Certainly. While the Lakeland outpouring seems to be continuing, I haven’t heard anything new from there recently. And I haven’t even heard anything new from the critics of Todd, just more mindless rants that I have mostly stopped responding to. And since I don’t have anything new or interesting to say just at the moment, I will not try to dredge something up just to keep my regular readers happy.

But I will report one piece of good news, even though doing so is I’m sure committing another deadly sin: I’ve won a competition! I correctly guessed which was Matthew’s lie, and am expecting a small prize in recognition of it.

Blogroll update

I have made some long overdue updates to my blogroll. I have taken off it some inactive blogs and also some which I have generally lost interest in. I have added some which I have discovered in the last few months and can recommend to my readers (without implying endorsement of all their content). I have not added blogs I would not otherwise recommend just because my blog has been added to their blogrolls – I accept no such obligation. I continue to read regularly a number of blogs which are not on my blogroll.

WordPress, somewhat inflexibly, sorts blogrolls in alphabetical order. But it seems to have got very confused by the two blogs with names partly in Greek letters, sorting them in the middle of the blogs with English names in a way which I can make no sense of.

I have also made some small changes to my blog to restore some items which were lost when I changed themes. Some of these may take time to get going again properly.

Wisdom about Todd Bentley

I have been meditating, at first while commenting here, on these verses:

13 Who is wise and understanding among you? Let them show it by their good life, by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom. 14 But if you harbor bitter envy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast about it or deny the truth. 15 Such “wisdom” does not come down from heaven but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. 16 For where you have envy and selfish ambition, there you find disorder and every evil practice.

17 But the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere. 18 Peacemakers who sow in peace reap a harvest of righteousness.

James 3:13-18 (TNIV)

In some other translations verse 17 mentions gentle wisdom, the title of this blog. Note the contrast between this gentle wisdom from above and the other kind of “wisdom” from another place. Note also how to tell the difference: the latter is characterised by “bitter envy and selfish ambition” whereas the former is “first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere.”

So what has this to do with Todd Bentley and the Lakeland outpouring? I have received hundreds of comments on my posts about this; all but a very few purely abusive ones I have allowed to stand. I have also read quite a lot of posts by others on this subject, some linking to my posts, some not. Some commenters have linked to pages of other material about Todd Bentley, only some of which I have read. Almost all of these posts, comments and linked pages have been written by people who profess to be Christians.

And, I am sad to say, a large proportion, probably a majority, of these comments, posts by others and linked material have been clearly negative about Todd Bentley and what is happening in Lakeland. Furthermore, they have typically, although with some honourable exceptions such as Lee’s comment (but much of the material quoted at his website is not an exception), been characterised by unreasonable negativity, judgmentalism and condemnation, often of a very personal kind, directed against Todd Bentley and his associates.

The relatively few good arguments that I have seen to bring Todd’s ministry into question, such as that he allegedly focuses too much on angels (or is it that his critics are focusing on just two or three occasions in a decade-long ministry when Todd has mentioned angels?), have been largely lost in the overlay of judgmentalism, of writing Todd off as a false teacher and an agent of the devil because of a supposed weakness in his theology – and in some case of vicious personal attacks on myself for daring to defend Todd. Agathos of Scotteriology seemed to be putting forward some serious arguments, but his aggressive reaction to my comments, attacking me for making explicit some obvious implications of what he wrote, betrays what kind of attitude is behind his reporting of this matter.

So, I’m sorry to say, the defining characteristic of these negative comments is bitterness and condemnation. In some cases I suppose that this springs from the “envy and selfish ambition” which James mentions. It would not be fair to suggest that it always does, but in very few of these condemnations of Todd’s ministry have I seen anything “first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere.”

By contrast, the comments I have seen endorsing Todd’s ministry, and those expressing genuine uncertainty about it, have mostly fitted well into the model of wisdom which is “first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere.”

So, I wonder, which kind of “wisdom” about Todd comes from heaven, and which from some other place?

John Hobbins writes, in a different context:

The old polemical premise of Bible thumperdom is that Scripture’s purpose is to prove that the views of an opponent are incompatible with biblical teaching. According to that template, the Bible is a bludgeon to hit someone over the head with.

The very people who complain about Todd’s apparent violence on stage seem to think nothing of using this kind of metaphorical violence in an attempt to knock out their opponents. Is that the wisdom which comes from heaven?

I’m afraid that the more I read intemperate and bitter negativity about Todd, the more favourably I think towards him. After all he clearly has the forces of evil going for him in a big way from the way that they have spurred people on to comments clearly characterised by evil attitudes like condemnation. Todd clearly has Satan worried! So, with enemies like these critics of Todd, who needs friends?

PS: One thing we do need to make clear about Todd is that he is primarily an evangelist. He is not a Bible teacher; that is a different ministry in Ephesians 4:11 and we should not expect him to do both. That is not an excuse for teaching what is wrong, but it is a good reason for Todd not attempting deep Bible teaching and for some of what he does teach being shallow. I take someone’s point that at Lakeland he is primarily preaching to the converted, to those who are at least nominally Christians, so is perhaps not operating as an evangelist. But then doubtless many of these people are nominal or backslidden if ever truly converted and so need the ministry of an evangelist. I am sure that Todd would also say that Lakeland is a special time for him for which he has been called and gifted in different ways. In fact there he is operating more in an apostolic ministry – although I would hesitate to call him an apostle because of the sometimes misleading connotations of authority in that word.

UPDATE: I just found Pastor Steve Hickey’s interesting series on the Florida outpouring. His first and second posts refer to the critics I have mentioned as the “seat of scoffers”, and also give clear positive stories of what he has witnessed at Lakeland. His third post is mostly a link to an hour long sermon on the subject (which I have not listened to), interestingly enough based on Matthew 11 which I have just referred to. His latest post is about the angel Emma, and concludes:

I’m thrilled to hear angels are visiting Todd Bentley. I hope angels visit you too.