Tony Blair and God

Ruth Gledhill has written a follow-up to her piece earlier today about Tony Blair, and so I will also write a follow-up to my earlier post.

Ruth reports what Tony had to say about his former press secretary Alastair Campbell’s infamous words “We don’t do God”. Blair said:

In our culture, here in Britain and in many other parts of Europe, to admit to having faith leads to a whole series of suppositions, none of which are very helpful to the practising politician.

He went into this in more detail, reported by Ruth, finishing with this:

And finally and worst of all, that you are somehow messianically trying to co-opt God to bestow a divine legitimacy on your politics.

So when Alastair said it, he didn’t mean politicians shouldn’t have faith; just that it was always a packet of trouble to talk about it.

Ruth is happy to report that with his new Faith Foundation

he’s not afraid to ‘do God’ now.

But I think she goes over the top in her enthusiasm when she writes:

There’s a vacuum in our national religious leadership at present which badly needs filling, and Tony Blair could be just the man to do it.

Yes, there is such a vacuum, but I don’t see that the public will ever trust Blair enough again to let him fill it.

Tony Blair, a good person?

Ruth Gledhill nominates Tony Blair as her ‘Good Person’ for today – and this is not the good joke she refers to in her title. If you haven’t seen that joke, also available internationally and probably permanently here, you really must – and don’t miss this explanation of how it was done. But back to Tony Blair …

Last year I reported on how some people were effectively calling Blair the Antichrist. At the time I suggested that the newly appointed Gordon Brown might have

been waiting in the wings for his chance to undo much of the damage caused by Blair.

Now, nine months into Brown’s government, I see little sign of this. True, Brown has almost ended British involvement in Iraq and partly backed down on identity cards. But in other ways, especially on moral issues, his government is causing even more concern than Blair’s did. So perhaps I should retract any suggestion that Blair was personally to blame for the mistakes of his government, and be prepared to look more favourably on him as a person.

And the same Ruth Gledhill, this time in an article today in The Times, has given me good reason to do so. She reports how he is setting up the Tony Blair Faith Foundation

to contribute to better understanding of the different faiths [and] to bring people of faith together to deliver the Millennium Development Goals … “Tony Blair believes that the capacity of faith organisations to do good is immense and that their reach is unparalleled,” an adviser said.

If Blair is really committed to what he is aiming for here, and can deliver it, he is certainly a “good person” not just for today but hopefully for decades to come.

Still more on "God damn America"

Since I posted about “God damn America” in context, I chanced upon a blog, with the possibly presumptuous name The Church of Jesus Christ, on which the anonymous blogger “Polycarp” has posted a transcription of much of Rev Jeremiah Wright’s controversial “God damn America” sermon. In fact the transcription was taken from another blog, The Roland Report.

Here are some of Wright’s words following on, not quite immediately, from the words “God damn America”:

The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent.

Tell your neighbor he’s (going to) help us one last time. Turn back and say forgive him for the God Damn, that’s in the Bible though. Blessings and curses is in the Bible. It’s in the Bible.

Where government fail, God never fails. When God says it, it’s done. God never fails. When God wills it, you better get out the way, ‘cause God never fails. When God fixes it, oh believe me it’s fixed. God never fails. Somebody right now, you think you can’t make it, but I want you to know that you are more than a conqueror through Christ. You can do all things through Christ who strengthens you.

I take Wright’s words “he’s (going to) help us one last time … forgive him for the God Damn”, although confusing without more verbal and visual clues, to indicate that Wright is partly retracting his earlier words and instead asking God to turn and help America “one last time”. So “God damn America” can be understood as a rhetorical flourish to get his listeners’ attention to what follows, and was never intended as a serious imprecation. It certainly succeeded in getting attention, but unfortunately the following words were cut off, even in the rather longer video to which I previously posted a link.

I largely agree with Polycarp’s appraisal:

First, what Rev. Wright said was not that far off. …

Why is what he said so offensive? He told the absolute truth and pointed out that in the end governments fail, but God does not. Anything wrong with that? Did he not point out the list of offenses that the government has made? God did the same thing to Israel. The problem that I think that many people have, is that they view what he said as racist. He is not. He said that Egypt has done the same thing. But why focus on another country where the people could not have connected to? Why speak about the horrors of Czarist Russia? No one would have connected. So, like most speakers trying to get a point across, he did his best to connect the audience to the topic.

Another thing, is that he ‘attacked’ the U.S. I hate to tell you this, but everything he said was correct. And another thing, this country is not divine, so stop saying that it is. Stop pretending that Christ died that the Declaration of Independence might be written!

"God damn America" in context

I may have upset some people with my post “God damn America”?, despite the quotes and the question mark in the post title. After all, the soundbite quotes in the video of Rev Jeremiah Wright are indeed rather shocking. But JR Woodward, in a thoughtful post (thanks to Pam BG for the link), has shown how the quotes from Wright’s sermons were taken completely out of context.

The example given in the Youtube video embedded by Woodward shows how Wright’s supposedly offensive words in the aftermath of 9/11:

America’s chickens are coming home to roost

are in fact a quotation of the words of a white ambassador. The video is well worth watching for the insight it gives into the real Jeremiah Wright, who is not at all the monster depicted by the original compilation of soundbites.

A search of Youtube found me this video giving the actual context of the words “God damn America”. Here is a transcription of a small part of this, from the very end of the video – of course I can’t imitate Wright’s style of preaching:

No, no, no, not God bless America. God damn America (that’s in the Bible) for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating her citizens as less than human. God damn America as long as she tries to act like she is God and she is supreme. The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent.

Watch more of this, and decide for yourselves whether in fact Wright’s sentiments were (in Jeremy Pierce’s words) “I want you to be damned, and I don’t want you to repent”, or “repent, America, or you will be judged”.

Update: Gorbachev is NOT a Christian

Last week I reported that Gorbachev is a Christian, on the authority of The Telegraph. Perhaps I should learn not to trust newspapers. For today I learn, thanks to another newspaper, a Christian one this time, (thanks also to Claude Mariottini for telling me about this in a comment) that Gorbachev is now insisting that he is not a Christian. He is quoted as saying:

To sum up and avoid any misunderstandings, let me say that I have been and remain an atheist.

Is this inconsistent with his words reported by the Telegraph?:

St Francis is, for me, the alter Christus, the other Christ … His story fascinates me and has played a fundamental role in my life.

Perhaps not. St Francis, and for that matter Jesus as presented in the Gospels, with their teaching on poverty and love, can easily be an inspiration for an atheistic communist, if they are allowed to be – and if the atheist ignores their teaching about God. It seems that this is an example of a journalist reading rather too much between the lines of Gorbachev’s remarks.

Gorbachev is a Christian

Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has publicly acknowledged for the first time that he is a Christian. In fact he probably has been a secret believer for many years, even back to when he was a Communist leader. Ben Witherington found an article about this in the Telegraph and wrote his own post about the significance of this for Russia.

In fact Gorbachev’s own confession of faith will have little effect in Russia. When I lived there for six months, a couple of years after he fell from power, I found no one who had a good word for him. Anti-communists blamed him for communism; pro-communists blamed him for the breakdown of communism; and all condemned him for restricting the sale of alcohol!

How should Christians respond to poverty and injustice?

How should Christians respond when faced with issus of poverty and injustice? This question has come up in the discussion of my post Why I shop at Tesco.

Much of the discussion has really been about who should be considered the poor people to whom I should show Christian compassion. I do not include among such people British farmers, who are complaining about being squeezed of their excess profits by supermarkets trying to keep the price of food down. I don’t approve of all the supermarkets’ business practices, but that is a commercial matter, not one for Christian social action.

Eclexia has a thought-provoking post on The Poor and Needy, basically asking what defines someone as poor and needy or as a worthy recipient of charity. See also her follow-up post. My personal situation is a bit similar to hers, in some ways poor (very limited income) while in other ways rich (significant assets tied up in property) – now as well as in the past when I was on the mission field. A large part of my concern is for the poor people (at least by western standards) of the estate around me, who are finding life very difficult at the moment because of rising food prices, and who have good reason to thank the supermarkets for fighting hard to keep prices down.

So the first question that Christians need to ask when faced with apparent poverty or injustice is whether it is real, and a really significant matter. Regrettably, in this world not everyone who asks for help is genuinely in need of it. Giving through registered charities (here in the UK) at least gives some assurance that most of the money given really benefits those for whom the appeal is made, although there is still no guarantee that their need is genuine. Sadly there is not even that assurance concerning the extra price paid for supposedly ethically traded items, much of which can end up in shareholders’ pockets.

So what can Christians do to respond to poverty and structural injustice? Here I am assuming a situation in which Christians are a rather small minority of the general population. I can see several possible types of reaction:

Continue reading

"God damn America"?

Rev Jeremiah Wright (presumably no relation to Bishop NT), pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, has hit the news because Senator Barack Obama, one of the main contenders for US president, is a member of his church. Kevin Sam has given a link to this compilation of extracts from his sermons, described by the commentator as “anti-American and very offensive” – not surprisingly since Wright’s words include “God damn America”:

Kevin reports, as the main point of his post, that Obama

is distancing himself from Rev. Wright’s political rhetoric.

Here is what I commented in response:

Well said Rev Wright! If speaking a few home truths like this, about present and past misdeeds of American governments, is called anti-American, then what hope is there for America? I understand why “God damn America” is considered offensive, but he will, and the process has started, if it doesn’t repent of its ungodly policies.

I don’t blame Obama for distancing himself from these remarks and the way they are presented. But I hope he has actually taken on board Wright’s criticisms and, if elected, will do something about putting them right.

In this hope I share Kevin’s outsider’s perspective that Obama is the best of the three candidates with a realistic chance of winning.

PS: My own country, the UK, is almost as much deserving of God’s judgment as the USA, for its complicity in Iraq and elsewhere. So please don’t think that I am biased against another country. The only real difference is that those of us who say so are not called anti-British, indeed I don’t think I have ever heard anything called anti-British.

Don't burn food to stop global warming

It is about a year since I first got involved with Avaaz.org, when I signed one of their petitions about Zimbabwe. Avaaz.org is an international campaigning group working for

stronger protections for the environment, greater respect for human rights, and concerted efforts to end poverty, corruption and war.

I have signed several of Avaaz.org’s petitions. I don’t support all their campaigns, and I think that some of you my readers might not support some of the ones I support, especially related to climate change. But I would expect all of you, at least all who call yourselves Christians, to get behind the one for I have just received an e-mail, with the subject line

Biofuels: the fake climate change solution

Whatever your overall view on global warming issues, you should be concerned about rising food prices for the poor (and perhaps for yourselves!). So please join me in expressing your support for this campaign, through the main link for this campaign and in other ways.

By following that link you will find a summary of the issues. But oddly enough I can’t find online the text of the e-mail I received, although it is publicly available and not copyrighted. Also posting the text including the footnotes is the only way that I can link to the sources Avaaz.org quotes, which demonstrate that there is real research behind this campaign. So here is the whole message, except for the sidebar and the end matter (also I have replaced the visible URLs in some links with the word “link”, they should still work as links):

Dear friends,

Each day, 820 million people in the developing world do not have enough food to eat1. Food prices around the world are shooting up, sparking food riots from Mexico2 to Morocco3. And the World Food Program warned last week that rapidly rising costs are endangering emergency food supplies for the world’s worst-off4.

How are the wealthiest countries responding? They’re burning food.

Continue reading

Why I shop at Tesco

Two different posts in the last few days from fellow Essex boys have attacked Tesco, the largest British supermarket chain. Vicar Sam Norton posted a sermon Thou shalt not shop at Tesco, and cartoonist Dave Walker, in a comment on the new Church Times blog, writes that when I buy £3 jeans from Tesco

surely you *know* the person making the jeans isn’t being paid fairly.

No, Dave, I don’t *know* this or even know it. Continue reading